American Freedom Law
Anna Von Reitz Fri, May 2, 2014S Subject: Popes Giving NWO Relief
FINAL NOTICE OF COMMERCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE DEFAULT February 3, 2014
Alaska Supreme Court via US Certified Mail # 7012 2210 0000 2447 3821
Alaska Judicial Council via US Certified Mail #7012 2210 0000 2447 3753
Alaska Attorney General via US Certified Mail # 7012 2210 0000 2447 3760Governor Sean Parnell via US Certified Mail # 7012 2210 0000 2447 3777
Lt. Governor Mead Treadwell via US Certified Mail # 7012 2210 0000 2447 3784
US marshal Robert Huen via US Certified Mail # 7012 2210 0000 2447 3791
Colonel Keith Mallard via US Certified Mail # 7012 2210 0000 2447 3807
Ms. Betsy Lawyer, CEO, First National Bank of Alaska via US Certified Mail #7012 2210 0000 2447 3814
Joseph Everheart, Regional President, 301 West Northern Lights Blvd, Anchorage, AK 99501 via US Certified Mail # 70122210 0000 2447 3883
Abstract: Since 1944 the International Monetary Fund (IMF) an agency of the UNITED NATIONS doing business as the UNITED STATES, INC. dba STATE OF ALASKA has functioned as a secondary Trust Management Organization (TMO)charged with the fiduciary obligation of fulfilling all service contracts of the bankrupted United States of America, Incorporated,during its Chapter 11 reorganization. In accepting the assets of the United States of America, Inc. the IMF also accepted its liabilities, which include the claims of the Priority Creditors, living Americans who are owed (1) reparations for the seizure of privately owned gold assets by the United States of America, Inc. acting in Breach of Trust during the 1930’s, (2) all interest in their private property, material rights, land, homes, businesses, persons and names that have been improperly entangled in the bankruptcy of the privately owned “United States of America, Incorporated” and (3) the natural resources possessed by the organic, geographically defined states of the Union.The IMF has claimed to represent the interests of all the Creditors of the United States of America, Inc., but has instead alleged that the living American People— to whom the IMF and its many subsidiaries owe good faith service — are “unknown creditors”. Chronic abuse by the IMF leadership and politicians acting in conflict of interest as corporate officers and employees of this privately owned and operated for-profit corporation dba the UNITED STATES, INC.— at the same time that they claim to “represent” the American People, has led to unrestrained and unauthorized hypothecation of public debt against private assets,identity theft, fiduciary malfeasance, fraud, extortion under armed force, and Breach of Trust usurpation.You are receiving this FINAL NOTICE OF COMMERCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE DEFAULT because you work for the UNITED NATIONS/IMF dba the UNITED STATES, INC. or one of its STATE franchises or agencies, or a banking institution impacted by these facts. You are responsible in some capacity for meeting the contractual and fiduciary obligations owed to the American People. You are being made explicitly, individually, personally, and undeniably aware of criminal acts of misadministration and malfeasance being committed and directed by IMF corporate officers functioning in blatant Breach of Trust and Conflict of Interest while occupying vacated and long-inactive Public Offices.Absent a specific, fully disclosed, voluntary appointment to act in behalf of specific individual Americans, there is no basis for any claim that any elected or appointed official employed by the UNITED STATES or its STATE franchises, agencies, or subsidiaries, represents anyone but themselves. Election to a corporate office does not imply Power of Attorney. Election to a private corporate office does not imply election to public office. The same is true of any elected or appointed official employed by the United States of America, Inc. and its State franchises. Sean Parnell has been elected to serve as the GOVERNOR of the STATE OF ALASKA, a corporate municipal franchise of the UNITED STATES, INC. This is not the same office as the Alaska State Governor, a civil office of the organic Alaska State.The claims of the IMF dba UNITED STATES, INC. against the private property and Estates of the American People have been denied and successfully rebutted at the highest levels of world governance.The “United States of America, Inc.” has been released from bankruptcy as of July 1, 2013, and all debts related to it and its franchises have been discharged, so that the UNITED STATES, INC. can no bill the United States of America, Inc. for services.You are being afforded the opportunity to self-correct and correct the operations of your Office/OFFICE. Failure to timely do so and provide remedy to those who have been harmed may result in you being prosecuted for impersonating American officials,double indemnity fines, up to ten (10) years in prison for per offense, commercial compensatory damage claims, and dissolution of the IMF, franchise, agency, bank or other corporate charter of the legal fiction entity you work for.
_____________________________________________________________________________________NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS IS NOTICE TO AGENTS, NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS. _____________________________________________________________________________________
This letter is your COMPLETE AND FINAL NOTICE informing you of crimes being committed under the auspices of your Office/OFFICE, making you individually and personally liable, and serving to make everyone associated with your Office/OFFICE an accomplice to these continuing acts of criminal fraud and malfeasance if immediate action to correct operations is not taken.
America was founded under the administration of commercial Trust Management Organizations, the most famous of which was the Virginia Company. As a result of the Revolutionary War, the American People formed an unincorporated domestic civil government. The Several states later contracted with an incorporated Trust Management Organization dba “United States” to provide international representation and stipulated public services in common.The American civil government based on individual and organic state sovereignty is known as The Republic. A more recent Trust Management Organization dba the United States of America, Inc. clearly admitted its status as a mere representative of the Republic when it popularized the Pledge of Allegiance: “…..and to the Republic for which it stands.”The Republic originally functioned in international commerce through the agency of an incorporated commercial Trust Management Organization known simply as the “United States”. George Washington was the Eleventh President of this Trust Management Organization, which predated the Revolutionary War.Thus there are two governments in America and there always have been. The Republic, which is the civil government of the American People, and a Trust Management Organization that is charged with providing nineteen enumerated services for the Sovereign States, most of which deal with international commerce.The Republic States that entered into the original equity contract known as The Constitution for the united States of America were represented by the original Trust Management Company dba “United States” from 1789 to 1863 when it was entered into bankruptcy caused by the expense of the Civil War. A second Trust Management Organization called the “United States of America, Incorporated” functioned from 1871 to 1933. Thereafter, the United States of America, Inc. was entered into bankruptcy by Executive Order issued by its President, Franklin Delano Roosevelt. The United States of America, Incorporated,entered into the receivership of International Bankruptcy Trustees, specifically, the Secretary of the Treasury of Puerto Rico,selected by the Creditors —-the IBRD, World Bank, and Federal Reserve. Since 1944, the United States of America,Incorporated’s business affairs have been managed by these same international bankruptcy trustees under the direction of these same creditors organized as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) acting under various corporate names including the UNITED STATES, the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, the USA, and E PLURIBUS UNUM THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.The State of Alaska is a corporate municipal franchise of the bankrupted United States of America, Incorporated. The STATE OF ALASKA is a corporate municipal franchise of the UNITED STATES, INCORPORATED. These entities are not the same as the geographically defined Alaska State. These Trust Management Organizations don’t have a contract to operate the civil government, though they have been conniving and contriving to do so for several decades with disastrous results.All bank officials operating businesses in the geographically defined Alaska State have knowingly or unknowingly set up checking, savings, and other depository accounts, including mortgage and escrow accounts, which result in unlawful conversion of private property into corporate assets. By creating these accounts in the NAMES of individual ESTATE trusts owned and operated by the UNITED STATES, INC. instead of the names of the living people, private bank accounts belonging to john-quincy:adams have been unlawfully converted to the ownership of Puerto Rican trusts owned and operated by the UNITED STATES, INC. under the NAME of JOHN QUINCY ADAMS.This semantic deceit dependent upon the use of “similar names” and the constructive fraud of non-disclosure practiced by the banks has resulted in claims by the IMF dba UNITED STATES, INC. that the funds and contracts under deposit as negotiable instruments are the property of UNITED STATES, INC. “individual franchises” and are subject to seizure by the UNITED STATES, INC. and available to serve as collateral backing the debts of the UNITED STATES, INC.All banks and bank officials operating in the Alaska State are under NOTICE and DEMAND to correct their records to reflect the fact that all assets contained in or claimed by “individual franchise ESTATE trusts” operated “in the name of” American Nationals and their private unincorporated business enterprises have been redeemed by the American Nationals having the same or similar given names and living at the geographic addresses of record on file. All bank and bank officials operating in the Alaska State are under NOTICE that any claim presented by any officer of the UNITED STATES or the STATE OF ALASKA pretending an interest in the private property assets of American Nationals or seeking to withdraw deposits under the authority of the Dodd-Frank Act are prohibited from any such action by Public Law of the Republic, and that any bank complying with such demand will be liquidated. Any banker aiding or abetting unlawful conversion of private assets for the benefit of the IMF dba UNITED STATES, INC. will be prosecuted to the fullest extent allowable under American Common Law.Any corporate Officer/OFFICER receiving this NOTICE who is unaware of the facts presented is invited to contact Interpol, the nearest Vatican Legate, or the International Services Agent for Alaska.Any corporate Officer/OFFICER receiving this NOTICE who believes that we are misunderstanding any of the historical facts or any aspect of the material circumstance, is invited to produce the single document which they believe grants their agency or Office/OFFICE jurisdiction and/or controlling ownership interest in living Americans, their private property assets, their credit,their labor, their organic states or any other material assets.In “representing” the Republic, the United States of America, Incorporated, was bound to honor all the contracts and Public Laws established by the Republic. In receivership, the United States of America, Incorporated, had to be operated according to the same Trust Indenture that was established by the Preamble and Bill of Rights, because it is not possible to receive the assets in bankruptcy without also receiving the liabilities. The UNITED STATES, INCORPORATED, acting as a secondary Trust Management Organization since 1933 has in turn undertaken to “represent” the United States of America, Incorporated, and is bound by the same obligations.We will address, briefly, the common claim made by Officers/OFFICERS representing either the “United States of America,Inc.” or the UNITED STATES, INC. to the effect that living American Nationals are “US citizens” subject to domination by any incorporated entity under contract to serve them.According to the Act of the Republic enacted as Public Law by the Members of Congress Assembled as an unincorporated Body Politic of the Domestic States on April 14, 1802, (2 Stat. 153, c. 28, ss.1, Revised Statute 2165)—“an alien may be admitted to become a citizen of the United States in the following manner, and not otherwise.”This is Public Law fully enacted as substantive law by the unincorporated Body Politic operating under full commercial liability as the domestic civil government of the Several States. It cannot be amended or repealed by any “Act” of any incorporated Trust Management Organization claiming to represent the Republic, and it sets forth a lengthy process that is required to redefine any American National as a “US citizen” subject to the corporate jurisdiction of the United States of America, Inc. and/or its Bankruptcy Trustees and successors, such as the UNITED STATES, STATE OF ALASKA, etc.Any claim that any private contract entered into by individuals can magically overcome this prerequisite of Public Law stands mute and dis-proven by the entirety of the Federal Register and Code, which unfailingly describes American Nationals domiciled in the geographically defined organic states as “non-resident aliens” with respect to the United States of America, Inc. and its municipal jurisdiction.Virtually no American Nationals have ever deliberately undertaken to become “US citizens” as required by US Statute at Large2. They have not by any knowing and voluntary act agreed to stand as sureties for a bankrupt Trust Management Organization calling itself the “United States of America” in 1930, 1933, 1959, or at any other time. They have not agreed under conditions of full disclosure to contract at all with the UNITED STATES, INC. to provide any services, much less have they granted any authorization to this foreign, privately-owned banking cartel to “represent” them or their interests as Priority Creditors of the United States of America, Inc. They did not grant authorization to any Governor/GOVERNOR or other elected or appointed official, corporate officer,employee, or hired contractor of the United States of America, Incorporated or the UNITED STATES, INCORPORATED, to represent them or their interests in these matters at any time from the founding of the Republic to date.They did not under conditions of full disclosure voluntarily grant authorization allowing any Trust Management Company to operate public trusts under their individual names, to lay claim to their private assets by presumption under color of law, to hypothecate debt based upon the value of their labor, their homes, land, or other resources, or to otherwise impose the debts,statutes, codes, or regulations of any corporation upon them. In 1995 a group of American Nationals moved to redeem and reclaim the individually named ESTATES created by the Secretary of the Treasury of Puerto Rico, the Bankruptcy Trustee appointed by the IMF. These Americans provided proof to the Internal Revenue Service/IRS and the Custodian of Alien Property/CUSTODIAN OF ALIEN PROPERTY and the US Bankruptcy Trustees/US BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEES that they were alive and competent to administer their own affairs, and that they were Priority Creditors of the United States of America, Incorporated. At that time and ever since, they have objected to any presumption that they are or ever were “wards of any State or STATE”—- ever incorporated, incompetent, or disabled.They have uniformly declared and testified before the world that they have been defrauded, lied to, lied about, victimized by deliberate semantic deceit, suffered extortion, armed robbery, gross fiduciary malfeasance, inland piracy, conspiracy against their rights and material interests, have suffered from self-interested non-disclosure, breach of trust, despotism, and default of commercial contract—all at the hands of Trust Management Organizations that are obligated to function in good faith and with full fiduciary liability.They have repudiated the claims of the United States of America, Inc. and the UNITED STATES, INC. which are merely privately owned for-profit commercial corporations no different than Microsoft, Incorporated, which have sought to attach the private property assets of individual American Nationals and the assets of the Republic via fraudulent deceit and misrepresentation. These Americans reclaimed their full sovereign authority among the nations of the world, and they redeemed all assets held in “public trusts” created by the United States of America, Inc. and the UNITED STATES, INC. All debt accrued against any public trusts operated under the given names or variations thereof of American Nationals by the United States of America, Incorporated or the UNITED STATES, INCORPORATED and any and all incorporated franchises of these Trust Management Organizations—-including the State of Alaska, STATE OF ALASKA, WELLS FARGO, INC., ABC MORTGAGE, INC, and so on—- is to be discharged, dollar for dollar, without exception. Clear fee simple title to the assets is to be returned to the individual American Nationals and the organic states of the Republic.The American Nationals have issued no valid proxy authorizing any agency, elected official, corporate officer, foreign agent or public employee of the United States of America, Inc. or the UNITED STATES, INC. to “represent” them in an abusive manner contrary to their material interests, nor did they grant any such authority to the Trust Management Organizations to represent them regarding these specific matters. They recognize no claims brought against them, their private property assets, or their organic states which are based on representations made “in their behalf” by third parties acting in Breach of Trust and contract default.The leadership of the UNITED STATES, INC. known as the US CONGRESS has recently passed the Dodd/Frank Bill,gratuitously granting themselves the right to pillage the bank accounts of Americans which have been purposely and self-interested constructed by the IMF dba UNITED STATES as accounts belonging to federal franchise “ESTATE trusts” without the knowledge or consent of the victims.The criminal intent of these actions is self-evident—first to unlawfully convert private bank accounts to the ownership of “public trusts” owned and operated by for-profit corporations merely pretending to “represent” the victims, second to claim that these private assets have been voluntarily “donated” to the public trust franchises, or “abandoned” by the legitimate beneficiaries of the assets.This NOTICE is your individual passport to a real “federal” prison if you do not immediately cease and desist all participation in support of these claims, actions, and intents.The living man, whose given name is properly written in this form: john-quincy:adams has been induced by undeclared foreign agents of the IMF dba UNITED STATES, INC. and the FEDERAL RESERVE dba United States of America, Inc. to believe that he is depositing his private property into his own private bank account, but in fact, he is always depositing his private property into a bank account owned by “John Quincy Adams” which is a foreign situs trust owned and operated by the United States of America, Inc. or “JOHN QUINCY ADAMS” which is an ESTATE trust owned by the banks operating the UNITED STATES, INCORPORATED.Any Officer/OFFICER receiving this NOTICE who doubts that this is true is invited to pull out their “personal check book” and look at what appears to be the signature line under high magnification. You will see under high magnification that the line is not a line. It is a row of micro-print endlessly repeating “authorizing signature” over and over. This verbiage has to be there, because the “owner” of the account, YOUR NAME, is a Puerto Rican Trust, and can’t function without human agents.The IMF, dba UNITED STATES, INC., has deceived millions of Americans into depositing their private assets into “public franchise accounts” without their knowledge or consent. Most likely many of the Officers/OFFICERS reading this NOTICE have been similarly victimized by this foreign interloper’s deceit, fraud, and self-interest. To lead you along in this deception they have allowed you to write checks on “their” account and claimed that you are an employee of their corporation—and as such, required to obey all their “laws”, rules, codes, statutes, and regulations that they may deem appropriate to establish and enforce.This is all a form of bunko that has only been made possible because the banks operating as creditors gained a position of trust via the bankrupting of the Trust Management Organization dba the United States of America, Inc. The IMF gained control of the apparatus of government services by creating the Secondary Trust Management Organization dba UNITED STATES, INC. which has been “filling in” while the United States of America, Inc. was in receivership. The FEDERAL RESERVE, another privately owned banking cartel, gained a similar position of trust as the primary creditor of the United States of America, Inc. throughout its bankruptcy reorganization.The IMF dba UNITED STATES and its corporate OFFICERS and their appointed Bankruptcy Trustees commandeered the apparatus of what Americans mistakenly thought of as their government, claimed to “represent” the American People, and have gone on an eighty-year rampage of white collar fraud the likes of which has never been seen in the history of the world.The IMF dba UNITED STATES, INC. has claimed that the American People have had a free choice in the midst of all this misrepresentation and unlawful conversion of assets. They could “redeem” their property held in the franchise ESTATE trusts set up in their NAMES by the banks at any time, simply by notifying the proper officials — the Internal Revenue Service. The American Nationals were never told any of this, so this remedy was never actually made available in any practical sense to the millions of rank and file Priority Creditors of the United States of America, Inc. The two Trust Management Organizations dba the United States of America, Inc. and the UNITED STATES, INC., were and are, both obligated to defend the National Trust, including the material interests and rights of individual Americans who are beneficiaries of the National Trust Indenture. Breach of Trust results in severance of contract, including the service contracts that go along with the fiduciary obligations owed as liabilities of the IMF and its agencies and franchises to the living beneficiaries—the American Nationals. Any concerted attempt by Trustees—whether individuals or entire vast incorporated Trust Management Organizations to impose upon the beneficiaries of a trust or to usurp the assets and collateral held in trust for the Trustees or the Trust Manager’s own benefit, is a High Crime of Felony Fraud and Criminal Malfeasance.The Supreme Court for the State of Alaska/THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA and The Superior Court for the State of Alaska / THE SUPERIOR DISTRICT COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA have been informed of these facts and have failed to correct their operations.These Undeclared Foreign Agents and Agencies employed jointly by the FEDERAL RESERVE, a privately owned and operated Central Bank employed by the bankrupted “United States of America, Inc.” and the IMF operating the UNITED STATES, INC.,have continued to presume a controlling interest in the assets of individual American Nationals and in already-redeemed individual ESTATES and to also presume that the private property assets of individual Americans were offered as surety and collateral for debts owed by the “United States of America, Inc.” –all based on insupportable and undocumented representations made by unauthorized third parties acting in Breach of Trust eighty years ago.They have continued on this course knowingly and despite having their offers to contract refused and all these false presumptions thoroughly rebutted in individual court actions entered as demonstration cases: 3AN-12-6858CI and 3PA-12-1447CI. This NOTICE includes presentation of charges against the Clerks and Judges operating The Superior District Court for the State of Alaska and the CLERKS and JUDGES operating THE SUPERIOR DISTRICT COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA. If these Officers of the British Crown do not immediately cease and desist in their activities in support of the fraudulent misrepresentations and claims being made by their employers they will be subject to deportation and seizure of their individual property assets in Alaska. This is real American Gold…….
A BRIEF REPORT #1
by Anna Von Reitz
For Those Trying to Understand the New World
Basic Concepts and Discussion
1.The natural world is organized according to air, land, and sea. 2.The systems of law and the governments and institutions of men have also been organized according to “jurisdictions” of air, land, and sea. 3.The jurisdiction of the land is national in nature. 4.The jurisdiction of the sea is international in nature. 5.The jurisdiction of the air is global in nature. 6.All actual assets, gold, silver, land, etc., have their existence on or in the land. 7.All fictional assets, titles, stocks, bonds, etc. have their existence on or in the sea. 8.There is a point of interface between land and sea known as international land jurisdiction established by the postal district(s), postal offices, and post roads which interface with sea lanes designated for international trade and travel. 9.As a result, a “corporate” entity which is private and non-commercial and unincorporated, like a Mom and Pop business, for example, Steve’s Food Store, may interface with and do business with an “incorporated” entity established by a corporate charter, like Food Services of America,Inc.10.This sort of business relationship takes place in the realm of International Trade, not Commerce,because Steve’s Food Store is not incorporated.11.In order for commerce to occur both entities must be incorporated and functioning under a charter granted by an unincorporated (sovereign) entity. 12.Unincorporated businesses function under “full commercial liability” and have to “indemnify”themselves. 13.Incorporated businesses function under “limited commercial liability” and have to “insure”themselves. 14.As a result, an unincorporated government such as the Shawnee Tribal Council or the United States of America (Unincorporated) can charter an incorporated business, such as Grand Fox,Inc., or the State of Illinois, Inc., but no incorporated entity can create an unincorporated one. 15.This is because a man can create and name an organization and stipulate a purpose and function for that organization, but such an organization cannot create a man. 16.In the past, unincorporated governments have created and chartered governmental services corporations in an effort to manage risk. So, the United States of America (unincorporated) or Delaware (unincorporated) could create and charter a commercial incorporated entity called the USA, Inc., or Delaware, Inc. or State of Oregon.
Page 2 of 10 A Brief Report….. 21 August 2017
17.Those incorporated (chartered) entities, such as the State of Oregon were then free to establish relationships with other incorporated entities (that is, conduct commerce) and to spin off municipal franchises like the STATE OF OREGON.
- Now that you see how this process works and know that the unincorporated entity (corporate but not incorporated) is really the source of all power in this system, the following pages will make better sense. Examples: Steve’s Food Store (Unincorporated) can create “Betty’s Market, Inc.” and then Betty’s Market,Inc. can create “municipal franchises” for itself — BETTY’S MARKET NYC, INC. The United States of America (unincorporated) can create “State of Idaho, Inc.” and then this State of Idaho can create the franchise STATE OF IDAHO or CITY OF BOISE. Obviously, it is of great importance to know whether a business is incorporated or unincorporated, and if it is incorporated, under what charter and ownership?
- Unfortunate History
- In the 1860’s the unincorporated government organizations got greedy and not only spawned all the various incorporated governmental services corporations via the process described, but also contrived to make living men subservient to these artificial constructs by “impersonating” and“enfranchising” them, too. This was done by copyright infringement and Breach of Trust, with the aim of creating “public trusts” which could then be pillaged and plundered under color of law. Let’s see what happened in England: the unincorporated government operated by Queen Victoria already had an incorporated (chartered) government services corporation, the United Kingdom, so then the United Kingdom, Inc., spun off a franchise operated as the UNITED KINGDOM which then established municipal charters for its own franchises, SCOTLAND,IRELAND, ENGLAND, WALES, NEW CASTLE, EXETER, and so on. This was going so well and so much new money was being raised from all these new assets(things to tax) created out of thin air, that Benjamin Disraeli promoted opening up the“enfranchisement opportunity” to the working class in England: give them a vote as corporate
- Page 3 of 10 A Brief Report….. 21 August 2017
shareholders in exchange for seizing upon the copyright to their names, their rights, their labor,the value of whatever private assets they might have— basically make them slaves of the government under the guise of voluntary indentured servitude, and issue bonds based on the value of all that formerly private property, too. Millions of unsuspecting Englishmen clamored to be “enfranchised” and thought that the right to vote was a good thing and that it was giving them a greater voice in their government,instead of surreptitiously stealing everything of value from them and “monetizing” it for the benefit of the government. A similar process was undertaken in America and throughout the Commonwealth countries at about the same time, with one interesting twist. The unincorporated government of the United States of America wouldn’t go along with it, so their governmental services company known as the United States Trading Company, was bankrupted via an illegal commercial mercenary “war”and its associated expenses. This left the bankruptcy Trustees a free hand to restructure the “federal government” into a British-style system analogous to what we described above. The perpetrators replaced the unincorporated United States Trading Company with the British-chartered United States of America, Inc., and the municipal United States, Inc., and both these corporations began chartering all their various municipal franchises like rabbits in springtime. Just as in England, the men were almost immediately enfranchised with the enticement to have a vote in the affairs of the corporations— but, the real deal was never disclosed. Later as the profits from enfranchising all the men dwindled, the pressure was on to enfranchise the women, too, and finally, the perpetrators sank so low as to create an automated system of enfranchising babies in their cradles. The end result of this system of enfranchisement (as in a McDonald’s franchise) is to enslave people under color of law and make them subservient to foreign corporations. They are themselves then impersonated and press-ganged and conscripted into the service of foreign governments — which has been outlawed for 200 years, and their land and other assets are seized upon and rolled into public trusts which can then be plundered and pillaged at will by the perpetrators. For example, the natural given Trade Name of a man born on the land jurisdiction of Vermont might be Jonathan Edmund Sykes. Instead of his Common Law Copyright to his own name being recorded as a land jurisdiction Trade Name, it is nowadays registered as a Foreign Situs Trust
Page 4 of 10 A Brief Report….. 21 August 2017
operating in the international jurisdiction of the sea as a “vessel” of the Territorial United States,which just coincidentally, happens to be doing business as “Jonathan Edmund Sykes”. This is a fundamental mis-characterization of the nature and political status of the man as a“person”— a fictional entity— which results in genocide on paper and identity theft in fact. His natural identity as a man and his lawful Trade Name is literally killed and considered a“decedent” upon the issuance of a false Birth Certificate in his name. Then, the Territorial United States corporation spins off “JONATHAN EDMUND SYKES”, a Cestui Que Vie municipal trust, and “JONATHAN E. SYKES” a Public Transmitting Utility, and so on —and all these names and fictional entities are used to en debt and control the living man as an asset and chattel without his knowledge or consent. The victim and his family are never told anything about it, and he never receives any actual compensation for all this. He receives whatever benefit everyone else receives from the construction of roads and bridges and ports and so on, and also is expected to pay for that benefit via taxes. The trusts established in his name are never claimed by him, because he doesn’t know that they exist, so the banks and governments claim that these assets are“abandoned” and seize them under false pretenses for their own benefit. Because the unincorporated government of the United States of America never agreed to any of this, and because it eventually had to be released from bankruptcy, it continues to exist, and is now not only free and clear of any debt, but also by definition is the Paramount Security Interest Holder and Priority Creditor of all the bankrupt foreign corporations and franchises of those corporations which have usurped upon our states and our people for the past 150 years. The Current Bankruptcies The UNITED STATES, INC. and all its municipal franchises dba CHINA (INC.), JAPAN (INC.), INDIA(INC.) , STATE OF OREGON (INC.), JOHN MICHAEL SMITH (INC.), CITY OF OMAHA (INC.), UNITEDKINGDOM (INC.), FLORIDA (INC.), CANADA (INC.), AUSTRALIA (INC.)…..ad infinitum, is in Chapter 7 Liquidation since 2015. This then forced the Territorial United States and its corporate franchises dba China (Inc.), Japan(Inc.), State of Oregon (Inc.), John Michael Smith (Inc.), City of Omaha (Inc.), United Kingdom
Page 5 of 10 A Brief Report….. 21 August 2017
(Inc.), Florida (Inc.), Canada(Inc.), Australia (Inc.)….ad infinitum, is in Chapter 11 Reorganization as of May 1, 2017—-because they are no longer the beneficiaries of the municipal franchises. Meantime, the actual, factual United States of America (Unincorporated) has been slogging along since 1868, objecting to this madness and continuing to operate its own silver currency and its own affairs despite the shameful and criminal operations of these foreign corporate interests which have operated in fraud and breach of trust and breach of commercial contraction our shores. Our lawful government has never ceased operations and the ignorance and uncaring and self-interest of various other nations does not change that fact. Other people, continue to try to confuse both the “United States, Inc.”and “United States of America, Inc.” with the unincorporated government of the United States of America—- which is like confusing a Barbie doll with a woman of the same name. Still others are intent on pretending that because these foreign territorial and municipal corporations named after us are bankrupt, that we are bankrupt— a process of “assumption”that we have publically and repeatedly objected to in no uncertain terms. Not only are we not bankrupt, we are the Paramount Security Interest Holders and Priority Creditors. The reason that all the other nations on Earth have an interest in denying our existence and competence is that they all without exception owe us money, or resources, or settlement of exchange balance sheets—- most of which they can’t pay. So they have been attempting to claim that our assets are “abandoned” and various parties have tried to seize upon us and our assets via other avenues, too—- all to no avail. We are here,we are alive and well, we know who and what we are, we know what has been done to us, and we know who is responsible.
In 2008…..Page 6 of 10 A Brief Report….. 21 August 2017
There were only a handful of unincorporated lawful governments left in the world: the Holy See,Iran, Iraq, Libya, North Korea, a few Pacific Island Kingdoms, and….. the unincorporated United States of America, though everyone discounted us at the time. With these exceptions, the Holy See owned and operated through its property management corporation, the VATICAN, all the incorporated governments doing business as governmental services corporations in the world. The unincorporated government of the Holy See chartered the municipal (city-state)governments and franchises including the UNITED STATES, INC., which chartered all the others as franchises: JAPAN, GERMANY, UNITED KINGDOM….. USA, JOHN MARK OLSON, CITY OF BALTIMORE and so on. It also held all the Territorial government corporations, secondarily, through Vassals. All roads literally led to Rome. All these corporations were created literally by the Holy See via the VATICAN, INC. or via the UNITED STATES, INC. or via the United States of America, Inc., and at the very top of the food chain, perched like a cherry on top of everything else, controlling – at least in theory – everything underneath it, was the unincorporated government of the Holy See. As you can see from history, there are those who wish to have the Holy See in this kind of control, and as you can also see, the Holy See has failed to do the job entrusted to it. We had a solemn and sacred treaty with the Holy See, a Concordat, which a few weasels attempted to “redefine” by impersonating us. To its credit, the Holy See and the Pope immediately took action to correct beginning in 2008. Nine years later, the unincorporated government of the United States of America — our government — is still standing and is the unquestioned Paramount Security Interest Holder of all American assets, and the Priority Creditor of most of the bankrupt governmental services corporations worldwide.
The corporations serving as the “federal government” are in bankruptcy liquidation (municipal) or bankruptcy reorganization (territorial) and are in receivership to bankruptcy Trustees.
From Page 7 of 10 A Brief Report….. 21 August 2017
our perspective, this is like having your local hair salon forced out of business and your local gas station in reorganization. It has nothing direct to do with us, except that we needed to find other service providers competent to cut our hair and fill our tanks—- and hopefully do a more honest job of it—who are nonetheless able to operate under the auspices of the original service contract, The Constitution for the united States of America. If we hadn’t found competent federal partners that exist under their own separate pre-existing charters and treaties, the actual Constitution would have been vacated from the federal side of the agreement— but we did find competent partners and we did issue new Sovereign Letters Patent. We have partnered with the American Native Nations to fulfill the responsibilities owed by the federal government until such time as the millions of Americans who have slept through this entire debacle can be brought up to speed and made whole and enabled to convene a competent land jurisdiction (continental) Congress.
There is no unmet national debt— there is only national credit that has not been applied to the ledger by those seeking to abscond with the payments made by millions of innocent people via bogus claims of abandonment and embezzlement. We have authorized the application of the national credit to the national debt and as the Priority Creditors of (almost) the entire world, do not need nor do we seek bankruptcy protection.
There are no valid foreclosures because these transactions have been voided by fraud and non-disclosure. All “mortgages” resulting from so-called “home loans” are debts owed by the territorial and municipal corporations, not people, and are in fact lease repurchase agreements,neither mortgages nor loans in fact. These governmental services corporations “borrowed” our assets without our knowledge or consent, hypothecated debt based on our assets, and have now gone bankrupt— leaving the world to suppose that we agreed to all this and that we are avoiding payment, when in fact we are objecting to claims of Odious Debt and taking practical action to end this fiasco. To protect the pension funds and investors while holding the people harmless, we have developed a means to hold all foreclosures in abeyance and translate this odious debt into credit— for the actual homeowners.
Page 8 of 10 A Brief Report….. 21 August 2017
Securities — The Funny Money
The various fiat currencies and bonds and securities related to them have to be restructured. It is a given that securities will continue to exist and be used in some forms in the future, but it is also a given that the securities now in existence have been compromised by counterfeiting and other issues. We will be wrapping old US Treasury Bonds and creating new hybrid high security bonds backed by gold, oil, or other actual commodity assets.
The Final Word
The Earth and our labor and the derivatives of our labor— copyrights, trademarks, patents, and so on – are the only sources of value on this planet and there is no exhaustion or limit of the riches and assets we all possess. This is true for all people of every nation. The Old Structure: As Regards the Relationship of The Holy See to the Incorporated Governments The Holy See Unincorporated Government of the Holy Roman Empire The Vatican Chancery Court – The Bank of the Holy See The Vatican City State Municipal Franchise The Vatican Bank The United States, Incorporated, Municipal Franchise (now in Chapter 7) All other Municipal Government Franchises World wideThe United States of America, Incorporated, Territorial Franchise (now in Chapter 11) All other Territorial Government Franchises Worldwide.
The New Structure:
As regards Settlement of Debts Owed and Ownership Interests
The Holy See
Page 9 of 10 A Brief Report….. 21 August 2017
Unincorporated Government of the Holy Roman Empire
Vatican Chancery Court – The Bank of the Holy See, United States of America Unincorporated Government of the United States American States and Nations Bank — International Trade Bank Athabascan and Lakota Sioux Tribal Nations Sovereign Bank of Dene – International Trade Bank Bank of Dene – Commercial Bank All Municipal Governments/Franchises Worldwide All Territorial
The entities shown in purple are sovereign and unincorporated. Those entities shown in blue are all incorporated either by direct charter or created as franchises under a charter. The Bank of Dene is the first new generation commercial bank on this Continent
NOTICE REGARDING AFFIRMATION OF CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED RIGHTS
This document supersedes all prior written and oral communications and has preferred authority over any unconstitutional mandates, laws, orders and recommendations not founded under any certified contract agreement.
I, First Middle Last © , am affirming my Constitutionally Protected Freedoms and my Unalienable Rights. No exemption(s) is/are required as per Amendments 1 and 4 protected under The Constitution for the united States of America, enshrining the freedom of religion and to be secure in my own private person.
As an employer, government official, school superintendent or otherwise you are without ANY LAWFUL AUTHORITY OR ANY KNOWN CONTRACTUAL COMMITMENT OF MY CONSENTto deprive me of my Constitutionally protected rights that are given and governed under my Creator. You SHALL NOT have without my willful and knowing consent the ability and authority to govern my freedom or my unalienable rights.
I shall not answer any questions as to my religious leadership, place of worship, or any details of my faith, deeply held religious beliefs or any and all of my personal and private medical property.
This shall and will serve as the final correspondence necessary to secure my protected freedoms under the Constitution from any and all trespasses and unlawful violations of unwarranted and experimental medical procedures, social restraint or enforcement of “color of law” repugnant to the Constitution for the united States of America for which the Constitution is founded on and serves to lawfully protect.
If any person, entity, corporation, or government fiction acting in absolute defiance and unlawful seizure of my rights, without my written and expressed authority and permission, shall stand in violation of my consent shall and will be held to answer in a formal court of law for the deprivation and trespass on my unalienable rights to the fullest extent of the law. When one does knowingly violate the rights of the people, no judicial immunity can be ascertained or had due to their knowing and willing acts of treason and sedition against the Constitution. Those that unlawfully seek to do harm and injury shall be held to the highest degree and penalty our justice will allow. My consent to be governed by unlawful mandates, statutes and codes, is hereby withdrawn providing no consent nor authority to be dominated and forced by any employer, government official, school superintendent or otherwise.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Title 18 U.S.C. §241 Conspiracy Against Rights.If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
Title 18 U.S.C. §242 Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
16 Am Jur 2d §71 Effect of Emergency. It issometimes argued that the existence of an emergency allows the existence and operation of powers, national or state, which violate the inhibitions of the Federal Constitution. The rule is quite otherwise. No emergency justifies the violation of any of the provisions of the United States Constitution.
16 Am Jur 2d Sec 177 late 2d, Sec 256: The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it is superseded thereby. No one Is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it
21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3, “Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies”: Appropriate conditions designed to ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) guidance on mandates. Regardless of whether these products are under EUA, or move into full licensure, anti-discrimination laws, both State and Federal, still apply regardless of mandates or product authorization. Even the EEOC stated that “EUA recognized protections that must be afforded to employees seeking exemption from vaccination [or other] requirements, due to medical conditions or sincerely-held religious beliefs.”
The following Federal and State Laws continue to ensure protection in numerous ways, including; sincerely-held religious beliefs, medical conditions, disability, or other unstated condition(s):
• The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
• The Rehabilitation Act (including the requirement for reasonable accommodations and non-discrimination based on disability, as well as strict rules about employer-mandated or employer-led medical examinations and inquiries)
• Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (which prohibits discrimination based on race, color, national origin, religion, and sex, including pregnancy)
• The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (which prohibits discrimination based on age, 40 or older)
• The Genetic Information Non-discrimination Act
Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 180 (1803) “. “All law (rules and practices) which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and VOID”. The 14th Amendment to the Constitution states “NO State (Jurisdiction) shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the rights, privileges, or immunities of citizens of the United States nor deprive any citizens of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law, … or equal protection under the law”, this renders judicial immunity unconstitutional.
Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 237, 243. (1985)states that I can stand upon my God given rights as an American citizen, my right to contract is unlimited, and that I owe NO DUTY to the state.
Mattox v. U.S., 156 US 237, 243. (1985) “We are bound to interpret the Constitution in the light of the law as it existed at the time it was adopted.”
City of Dallas v Mitchell, 245 S.W. 944. “To take away all remedy for the enforcement of a right is to take away the right itself. But that is not within the power of the State.”
Miller v. U.S., 230 F 2d. 486, 490; 42“There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of Constitutional rights.”
Murdock v Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 “No state shall convert a liberty into a license and charge a fee therefore.”
Section 802 of the USA PATRIOT Act (Pub. L. No. 107-52)
Expanded the definition of terrorism to cover “”domestic,”” as opposed to international, terrorism. A person engages in domestic terrorism if they do an act “dangerous to human life” that is a violation of the criminal laws of a state or the United States, if the act appears to be intended to: (i) intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion.
Under the Nuremberg Code, U.S.A. v. Karl Brandt (1947): Twenty-three doctors and administrators accused of organizing and participating in war crimes against humanity in the form of medical experiments and medical procedures inflicted on prisoners and civilians. The four counts of indictments are: Conspiracy to commit war crimes against humanity, War Crimes, Crimes against humanity and Membership in a criminal organization.
The declaration of a State of Emergency for the COVID-19 diagnosis criteria for a series of pneumonia and influenza related symptoms and the allegations of the existence of a “novel coronavirus” is based on a series of assumptions that are patently false.
1. According to the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses’ (ICTV) Coronaviridae Study Group (CSG) publication on March 2, 2020, the preliminary data suggesting that there was sufficient variation to determine this to be a novel virus vs. a mutation of known coronaviruses, was not based on established scientific principles but was responsive to the World Health Organization’s prior unfounded declaration of novelty of both the virus and a new disease;
2. There could be no independent verification of the epidemiologic models predicting dire infection and mortality rates as the underlying models and data were not published, and when sought, were reportedly corrupted so as to make their examination impossible;
3. In violation of State law, no medical or scientific evidence was provided to establish even causal links between the SARS CoV-2 and the symptoms of COVID-19, relying instead on foreign government hearsay and conjecture;
4. Since 2003, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and their subordinate organizations – the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) – maintained a patent preventing any independent organization from testing for the presence of coronavirus transmissible to humans through 2018 resulting in a complete lack of testing technologies;
5. No State official reviewed for accuracy or veracity any of the causal statements made in the Declaration of Emergency which contain false, misleading, and terror inducing statements;
6. In violation of well-established legal precedent from Jew Ho v. Williamson, 103 F. 10, 26 (C.C.N.D. Cal. 1900) and subsequent public health law, arbitrary and capricious rules were inflicted upon a part of the population that were not applied generally, resulting in the unlawful confinement of a healthy population with no basis in science or fact;
7. The Governor failed to provide adequate testing to confirm or deny the presence or absence of “a novel coronavirus” and, based on recent reports from testing of incarcerated persons reported by Reuters, 96% of prisoners testing positive for coronavirus are asymptomatic, demonstrating a failure to establish even a statistical link between the virus and the disease;
8. Neither the Governor, public health officer nor any corporate entity has followed evidence-based, peer-reviewed, clinical science showing that neither social distancing (of up to 6 feet of separation), nor the wearing of masks has any clinical effect in a healthy population and that instituting such policies is exclusively for the inducement of fear and terror in the population.
“THERE IS NO CLINICAL DATA SHOWING THAT THE ‘RESTRAINT OF HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS’ HAS ANY EMPIRICAL DATA SUPPORTING ITS USE. NO EVIDENCE SUPPORTING EMERGENCY DECLARATIONS HAVE BEEN OFFERED WITH THE EXCEPTION OF STATEMENTS MADE BY COLLUDING PARTIES SEEKING TO BENEFIT FROM VACCINATIONS, TESTING OR THE COMBINATION –NEITHER OF WHICH CAN BE REASONABLY EXPECTED GIVEN THE PATENTS GRANTED TO AND HELD BY THE COLLUDING PARTIES.”
I amlawfully protected through the “Bill of Rights” and shall be given the opportunity to decide to consent, or not to consent, to any and all medical experiments, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, bullying, coercion, intimidation or undue influence on my proper and lawful decision.
This Notice presents a number of grave, ethical, medical, economic, and unconscionable risks that are taken by any and all who knowingly and willingly choose to ignore the severity of the hidden consequences. Those that fail to adhere to Federal laws, the Constitution for the united States of America, The Bill of Rights and my unalienable rights shall and will be prosecuted to the fullest extent that the law will allow.
I,_______________________________________________________________the lawful man/woman DO NOT GIVE CONSENT and withdraw any and all unlawful EUA products or testing on myself but not limited to; EUA Tests, EUA Medical Procedures, EUA Facial Masks/Coverings, EUA Investigational Products, including facial masks, EUA Testing Centers, EUA Health Data Tracking and Surveillance Platforms, Population Genomics Programs, Diagnostic Laboratories, IT Health Data Platforms Social Distancing, Covid testing, Temperature Taking and/or any and all Experimental Gene Therapy injections known as the so called “COVID19 Vaccine.” I move that “name of organization” rectify and cure providing true and faithful evidence of a pandemic and if found negligent shall provide at any cost to make myself and others whole. I demand that you Cease and Desist any and all unlawful mandates such as; facial covering, social distancing, discrimination, intimidation, coercion, bullying, trespass, unlawful programs, unlawful enforcement of the so called COVID19 vaccines /injections, policies and procedures violating my unalienable rights through the implementation of these unlawful and unfounded programs and ensure Constitutionally protected compliance and the training necessary for staff and all subordinates.
NOTICE REGARDING AFFIRMATION OF CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED RIGHTS
28 U.S.C. §1333, §1337, §2461 and §2463
A private and not a Public Communication
Notice to Agent is Notice to Principle
Notice to Principle is Notice to Agent
Applicable to all successors and assigns
Silence is Acquiescence/Agreement/Dishonor
THIS IS A SELF EXECUTING CONTRACT
RESISTANCE TO TYRANTS IS OBEDIENCE TO GOD.” – BEN FRANKLIN
All Rights Reserved,
I, Your Full Name Here Date
In Your State,
County of Your County,
I swear that on this __________ day of _______________________________, 2021,
the above named, First, Middle, Last Name, personally appeared before me,
and of his/her own free will, signed and executed this Notice Regarding Affirmation of Constitutionally
My Commission Expires:__________________________________
RE: COVID19 Vaccine Mandate
I am writing in regard to the COVID19 Mandate. I understand that you intend to require vaccination to all students/employees. As I am sure you are aware, the COVID19 vaccines are presently authorized under emergency use authorization (“EUA”)
It is a violation of Federal Law to mandate receipt of a product that is only available pursuant to an EUA. Employer Name or School cannot require employees/students to receive a COVID19 vaccine that is being distributed under an EUA.
Emergency Use Authorization of COVID-19 Vaccines
In December 2020, the FDA granted EUA for two COVID-19 vaccines, one sold by Moderna and the other by Pfizer. Both are based on an RNA technology never before used in a licensed vaccine. In February 2021, the FDA granted EUA for a third COVID-19 vaccine sold by Janssen. This is a novel viral vector vaccine platform. The clinical trials that the FDA will rely upon to decide whether to license these vaccines are underway, but they are far from complete.
The EUA applications for these experimental vaccines were based on data which supports that these products may reduce certain symptoms of COVID-19 for some individuals, but the FDA’s EUA authorizations made clear that there is no evidence the COVID-19 vaccines can prevent recipients from becoming infected with and transmitting the virus.
1 As the FDA explains, at the time of the EUA approval, the data was “not available to make a determination about how long the vaccine will provide protection, nor is there evidence that the vaccine prevents transmission of SARS-CoV-2 [i.e., the virus that causes COVID-19] from person to person.”
2 In fact, the FDA Briefing Documents for the COVID-19 vaccines supporting the grant of an EUA list the following as still unknown:
• “[e]ffectiveness in certain populations at high-risk of severe COVID-19,”
• “[e]ffectiveness in individuals previously infected with SARS-CoV-2,”
• “effectiveness against asymptomatic infection,”
• “effectiveness against long-term effect of COVID-19 disease,”
• “effectiveness against mortality,” and
• “effectiveness against transmission of SARS-CoV-2.”3
The FDA Briefing Documents also make clear much is unknown about the safety of these products, including,
• “[a]dverse reactions that are very uncommon,”
• adverse reactions “that require longer follow-up to be detected,” and
• whether the vaccines will cause “[v]accine-enhanced disease.”4
As a result, the authorization letters for both COVID-19 vaccines expressly provide that the vaccines are each “an investigational vaccine not licensed for any indication” and require that “[a]ll promotional material relating to the COVID-19 Vaccine clearly and conspicuously … state that this product has not been approved or licensed by the FDA, but has been authorized for emergency use by FDA.”5
Reflecting that these vaccines have not yet been demonstrated to be safe and effective, use of one of them was recently paused by the CDC and FDA due to serious reactions that have proven fatal in some cases.6 This exemplifies why the authorization letters for the COVID-19 vaccines, in accordance with federal law, expressly provide that these vaccines cannot be required and must remain optional.
Federal Law Prohibits Mandating Products Granted EUA
The same section that authorizes the FDA to grant an EUA, Section 564 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the “Act”), codified at 21 U.S.C. 360bbb-3, requires that the public have “the option to accept or refuse administration of the product.” 21 U.S.C. 360bbb-3(e). It even provides that the Secretary of HHS is to “ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed” of “the option to accept or refuse administration of the product.” (Id.)
The FDA and CDC’s guidance and regulations reflect the statutory prohibition from mandating that an individual receive a product that has only been granted EUA. For example, the FDA guidance entitled Emergency Use Authorization of Medical Products and Related Authorities provides that:
For an unapproved product [such as the COVID-19 vaccines], the statute [21 U.S.C. 360bbb-3] requires that FDA ensure that recipients are informed … [t]hat they have the option to accept or refuse the EUA product…7
Similarly, when responding to an inquiry regarding whether the COVID-19 vaccines can be required, the Executive Secretary of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (“ACIP”), Dr. Amada Cohn, publicly stated that “under an EUA, vaccines are not allowed to be mandatory. Therefore, early in the vaccination phase individuals will have to be consented and cannot be mandated to be vaccinated.”8 Dr. Cohn then reaffirmed to the FDA’s Vaccine and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee that no organization, public or private, can mandate COVID19 vaccines:
Organizations, such as hospitals, with licensed products do have capability of asking their workers to get the vaccine. But in the setting of an EUA, patients and individuals will have the right to refuse the vaccine.9
The EUAs for the COVID-19 Vaccines Repeats this Prohibition
The EUA letters for Pfizer, Moderna, and Janssen provide that each:
COVID-19 Vaccine is authorized for emergency use with the following product specific information required to be made available to the vaccination providers and recipients, respectively (referred to as ‘authorized labeling’):
• Fact Sheet for Health Care Providers Administering Vaccine … [and]
• Fact Sheet for Recipients and Caregivers.10
These facts sheets each provide that the receipt of the vaccine must be optional. The Fact Sheets for Healthcare Providers for the three COVID-19 vaccines state that: “The recipient or their caregiver has the option to accept or refuse [the] COVID-19 Vaccine.”11 Similarly, the Fact Sheets for Recipients and Caregivers for each COVID-19 vaccine state on the first page: “It is your choice to receive the  COVID-19 Vaccine.”12
The Fact Sheet for Recipients and Caregivers for each of the COVID-19 vaccines also set forth in sequence the information required to be provided to recipients of the vaccine pursuant to section 564 of the Act, including “the option to accept or refuse administration of the product” and “the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product.” 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb3(e)(1)(A)(ii). All of the COVID-19 vaccine fact sheets provide the required information in sequence, including telling potential recipients: “It is your choice to receive or not receive the  COVID-19 Vaccine,” and that if “you decide to not receive it, it will not change your standard of medical care.”13
By implementing its vaccine mandate, Your Employer or School is deliberately taking away each employee’s/student’s statutorily guaranteed right to decide whether to accept or refuse administration of the COVID-19 vaccines. Your Employer or School is doing so openly, without any regard for the personal and autonomous right of each employee/student to choose whether they want to receive an unapproved and unlicensed medical product.
Your Employer or School is effectively forcing each employee/student to choose between facing expulsion/termination from Your Employer or School or receiving an experimental medical treatment to which they do not consent.
The right to informed medical consent is considered a fundamental, overriding principle of medical ethics and international law, first laid down by United States government jurists in the Nuremberg Code. See e.g., The Nuremberg Code (1947), 313 BMJ 1448 (1996) (“The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person…[is] able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of…coercion.”); 14 see also UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, Article 6(1).15
Public policy further demands that uncoerced consent is required. Congress made this plain in the Act by assuring that individuals can make their own medical decisions when it comes to EUA products, even during times of emergency. The only exception Congress granted for allowing an EUA to be mandated is a Presidential order requiring members of the armed forces to receive the product.16
The clear policy choice made at the highest levels of government to protect the individual’s right to choose is further supported by the fact that whether COVID-19 vaccines are actually safe and effective is not yet known and will not be known until, at the earliest, the Phase III clinical trials are completed. The FDA-approved study protocols for the COVID-19 vaccines’ timelines for collecting safety and efficacy data from trial participants is approximately two years. (Moderna’s calls for 759 days of data collection, Pfizer’s 742 days, and Janssen’s 24 months.) When these companies submitted applications for an EUA, they had only accumulated data from study participants for a median of 6 to 8 weeks, i.e., less than 10% of the full study period.
As explained above, these vaccines have not been proven to prevent infection or transmission. Therefore, requiring that employees/students receive these vaccines to prevent infection is unscientific. It is also nonsensical to not require faculty and staff, some of whom may have a risk of severe COVID-19, while requiring healthy, people to receive this experimental product. To the extent the Your Employer or School policy permits faculty, staff, and other individuals to choose or refuse vaccination, but does not allow that same choice for other employees/students, this may raise equal protection issues.
Additionally, Your Employer or School is failing to take into consideration that a significant portion of its employee/student population is likely to have had SARS-CoV-2 and fully recovered. Putting aside the immunity conferred by having been previously infected, there have been concerns raised by medical professionals that vaccinating those recently infected can lead to serious injury or death by causing antigen specific tissue inflammation in any tissues harboring viral antigens.17 Your Employer or School should consider whether it might be liable for any damages, poor health outcomes, and loss of life due to mandatory COVID-19 vaccination policies forced upon its employees/students. While manufacturers and vaccine administrators are protected by the PREP Act, Your Employer or School is not.
For all of the foregoing reasons, we respectfully request that Your Employer or School give serious consideration to the issues raised herein and withdraw its COVID-19 vaccine mandate forthwith since requiring an unlicensed and unapproved product violates federal law, international laws, civil and individual rights, and public policy.
First, Middle Last Name
1 See https://www.fda.gov/media/144416/download, https://www.fda.gov/media/144673/download, and https://www. fda.gov/media/146338/download (“Data are limited to assess the effect of the vaccine against transmission of SARSCoV-2 from individuals who are infected despite vaccination.”). 2 “FDA Takes Additional Action in Fight Against COVID-19 By Issuing Emergency Use Authorization for Second COVID-19 Vaccine” available at https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-takes-additionalaction-fight-against-covid-19-issuing-emergency-use-authorization-second-covid (emphasis added) . 3 “FDA Briefing Document Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine” available at https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/ download; “FDA Briefing Document Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine” available at https://www.fda.gov/ media/144434/download;
“FDA Briefing Document Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine” available at https://www.fda.gov/media/146217/download. 4 Id. 5
7 FDA’s Emergency Use Authorization of Medical Products and Related Authorities – Guidance for Industry and Other Stakeholders available at https://www.fda.gov/media/97321/download (emphasis added)
. 8 Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices’ August 26, 2020 Summary Report available at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/min-archive/min-2020-08-508 .pdf at 56 (emphasis added).
9 The FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) Meeting Transcript of October 22, 2020 available at https://www.fda.gov/media/143982/download at 156.
10 FDA’s EUA letter for Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine available at https://www.fda.gov/media/144412/download;
FDA’s EUA letter for Moderna COVID-19 vaccine available at https://www.fda.gov/media/144636/download;
FDA’s EUA letter for Janssen COVID-19 vaccine available at https://www.fda.gov/media/146303/download.
11 Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers Administering … Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine available at https://www.fda. gov/media/144637/download; Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers Administering … Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine available at https://www.fda.gov/media/144413/download; Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers Administering … Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine available at https://www.fda.gov/media/146304/download.
12 Fact Sheet for Recipients … Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine available at https://www.fda.gov/media/144638/download;
Fact Sheet for Recipients … Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine available at https://www.fda.gov/media/144414/ down load; Fact Sheet for Recipients … Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine available at https://www.fda.gov/media/146305/ download. 13 Id.
15 http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html (“[P]reventive … medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned… The consent … may be withdrawn … at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice.”).
16 See 10 U.S.C. § 1107a available at https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/1107a.